<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>vulgar Archives - Pickrel Schaeffer &amp; Ebeling</title>
	<atom:link href="https://pselaw.com/tag/vulgar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://pselaw.com/tag/vulgar/</link>
	<description>The Only Law Firm You&#039;ll Ever Need®</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 16:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Commercial Speech and Vulgarity</title>
		<link>https://pselaw.com/commercial-speech-and-vulgarity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pam Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 16:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business, Tax & Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael W. Sandner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boardman township]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broke ass phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obscene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulgar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulgarity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.pselaw.com/?p=8785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Commercial Speech Continues to Test the Limits of What Is Obscene, Immoral, or Subject to State Regulation A few months ago, my partner, Gerald McDonald wrote an article cautioning that potentially vulgar speech may quickly be materializing in much more prevalent commercial applications.&#160; The subject of Jerry’s article involved vulgarity in trademark registration, but a&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://pselaw.com/commercial-speech-and-vulgarity/">Commercial Speech and Vulgarity</a> appeared first on <a href="https://pselaw.com">Pickrel Schaeffer &amp; Ebeling</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Commercial Speech Continues to Test the Limits of What Is Obscene, Immoral, or Subject to State Regulation</strong></h3>


<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright is-resized"><img decoding="async" src="https://www.pselaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/BAP.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-8790" width="272" height="125"/></figure></div>


<p>A few months ago, my partner, Gerald McDonald wrote an <a href="https://www.pselaw.com/trademarks-and-vulgarity-good-golly-what-in-tarnation-is-going-on/">article </a>cautioning that potentially vulgar speech may quickly be materializing in much more prevalent commercial applications.&nbsp; The subject of Jerry’s article involved vulgarity in trademark registration, but a recent decision from the Seventh District Court of Appeals illustrates a context which may bring the issue much closer to home for most.&nbsp; </p>


<p>In
<em>Broke Ass Phone v. Boardman Township Board of Zoning Appeals</em>,
2019-Ohio-4918 the issue before the Court of Appeals was whether or not the
Board of Zoning Appeals had erred in prohibiting Broke Ass Phone Company from
replacing its commercial street sign in front of its business.&nbsp; The case involved the interplay between Broke
Ass Phones right to use its legally registered and legally trademarked name
with Boardman Township’s zoning resolution which sought to regulate obscene
word or words of immoral character.&nbsp; The
Court’s analysis focused on the fact that Broke Ass’s sign would be considered
commercial speech.&nbsp; Commercial speech is
protected from unwarranted governmental regulation, but the key is “unwarranted
governmental regulation.”&nbsp; In an effort
to analyze this the Court looked at whether the zoning restriction sought to
implement a substantial government interest.&nbsp;
While the Court held that there was legitimate governmental interest in
preventing the Township’s residents from being exposed to obscene, pornographic
or immoral signs, at the end of the day the Court found that the word “Ass” was
neither obscene in context, nor immoral.&nbsp;
Although there was a vigorous dissent, the Court held that the State
could not regulate speech that posed no danger to the asserted State interest
and therefore held that it was unconstitutional to restrict its use.&nbsp; </p>


<p>Municipalities should take note of the analysis this employed by the Seventh District’s decision, as well as the Seventh District’s comments on the evidence that the Court would have expected to have seen submitted in a case like this.&nbsp; For business owners the case provides another example of, and possible support, to push the envelope in this context. </p>


<p>If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact <a href="https://www.pselaw.com/attorneys/michael-sandner/">Michael W. Sandner</a> at Pickrel, Schaeffer &amp; Ebeling Co., L.P.A. to review or discuss. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://pselaw.com/commercial-speech-and-vulgarity/">Commercial Speech and Vulgarity</a> appeared first on <a href="https://pselaw.com">Pickrel Schaeffer &amp; Ebeling</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
